A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among prospective neighbours in excess of the construction of a wall at a coastal site in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes captivated national awareness subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design is effective at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek out to build their household household. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are subject to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a sensitive coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their authorized group has characterised the action as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-substantial water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, a picture which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Assemble Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the drinking water for the duration of critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site became Among the most putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these actions were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and conditions hooked up for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to establish a loved ones dwelling in accordance With all the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Space of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Experienced advice and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental troubles, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from quite distinct Expert backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it can finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely on the court docket’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable proceed to look in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.